Why Nicholas II Survived the Revolution of 1905 but Not that of 1917 Es

Why Nicholas II Survived the Revolution of 1905 but Not that of 1917 When Father Gapon and his followers marched peacefully on the Winter Palace on 22nd January in what came to be know as flaming(a) Sunday due to the extreme reaction principal to the massacre of the protestors, it sparked the diversity of 1905, consisting of workers strikes and protests in addition to terrorising the wealthy and important upper classes. As well as being a response to Bloody Sunday, the 1905 revolution was a result of pent up dissatisfaction with the autocracy in Russia and with the vast social inequality. However, in spite of the unrest within the country, the tzar managed to retain power after this revolution. In 1917, when the people revolted again, he was non so lucky, and the autocracy fell. There are many reasons why the tzar was able to survive the 1905 revolution, not least of which was the benefit of good ministers to purpose him well. Stolypin tried to have a moderating influence on the tsar and to help him make concessions to the people which would promise to improve their lives enough that the revolution would die down. However, by 1917 both Stolypin and Witte were dead, and the tsarina Alexandra was in charge of the racetrack of the country due to the Tsars absence to the front to fight with the army. During the time in which he was away, Alexandra replaced many of Nicholas ministers with her own personal favourites, closely of whom were poorly supply to hold such influential positions at such an unstable time. collectable to this, the Tsar had few capable ministers to advise him through the crisis when revolution broke out and help him emerge unsca... ...es stipulated therein played a whacking trip in his downfall in 1917. The emergence of the free solicit after 1905 granted the right to express opinions by publication meant that the Tsar was widely criticised to the public for the first time, w hereas previously none of his wrong-doings had ever been make known, and he was viewed as ordained by god. Now however the Russians began to escort him as fallible and to question his actions, leading to further unrest. Similarly, and perhaps most importantly, the Duma in 1917 provided a viable alternative to the autocracy which had not been enclose in 1905. Ironically, just as freeing the serfs had led to them wanting more than and assassinating Tsar Alexander II, Nicholas grandfather, so granting the people their Duma in 1905 in part led to the eventual downfall of the Tsar in 1917.